Strojno čitljivo upravljanje
Pravila upravljanja koja strojevi mogu otkriti i izvršiti: llms.txt, manifesti /ai/, datoteke politika /.well-known/, JSON sheme, potpisani tokeni licence i formati revizijskih zapisa. Ova je stranica sama funkcionalan primjer.
Pitanja koja se proučavaju
01
Od robots.txt-a preko llms.txt-a do manifesta prava
02
Konvencije za otkrivanje politika putem /.well-known/
03
JSON shema kao normativni format specifikacije
04
Mogućnost revizije: zapisi, verzije, podrijetlo
Povezane bijele knjige
- AICR / AICL as an AI Content Licensing and Agentic Payment Connection Layer Sloj strojno čitljivih specifikacija za deklariranje prava nad AI sadržajem i tijekova licenciranja — od indeksiranja putem AI-ja i prava na sadržaj do znanja spremnog za strojne transakcije.
- AI Rights Spectrum: From robots.txt to an AI Learning Permission Protocol AIRS i AILP izražavaju nijansirana dopuštenja za učenje AI-ja izvan binarnog dopušteno/nedopušteno — što AI smije naučiti, do koje dubine, za koje namjene i uz kakvu naknadu.
- Protocolized Openness: Why “Not Prohibited” Does Not Mean “Learnable” in the Age of AI Nedefinirana otvorenost AI procesi tumače kao pravnu neizvjesnost i uklanjaju je; samo protokolizirano, strojno čitljivo dopuštenje čini sadržaj istinski dostupnim za učenje.
- AICL-I v0.2: AI Ingestion & Capability Layer A five-component website architecture — manifest, corpus, capability, runtime control, governance — that lets AI, agents, and crawlers correctly ingest, invoke, and verify a site's knowledge and capabilities within explicit content, action, and authority boundaries.
- AI Content Payment and the Network Democratic Economy Argument političke ekonomije: procjene vrijednosti AI-ja mjerene bilijunima stvaraju pritisak legitimnosti za slojevito licenciranje sadržaja i dijeljenje javne koristi — podaci postaju slojeviti, a ne (samo) skuplji.
- From Crawler Rights to Agent Authority: Extending AGIRIGHT from Content Governance to Protocol-Native AI Agents The bridge paper for AGIRIGHT's Agent & Protocol Rights family: why content permission, action permission, delegated authority, and inspection rights must be four separately-evaluated axes, not one.
- AARS v0.1 — Agent Action Rights Spectrum The full protocol draft behind the AARS page: an A0–A7 human-readable spectrum, a machine-readable action vector, and rules for composition risk and capability amplification.
- AADP v0.1 — Agent Authority & Delegation Protocol The full protocol draft behind the AADP page: principal ≠ actor, delegation that can only narrow, and an inspection ceiling that bounds how much a verifier may demand.
- AGIRight.org Technical White Paper v0.2 — From AI Content Governance to Protocol-Native Agent & Authority Rights The site's current architecture document: six protocol drafts across two families (content & learning, agent & protocol rights), an integration layer, and an ethical-protection layer, plus the acceptance criteria this site update was built against.
- The Minimum Ethical Protection Proposition for AI Rasprava o pravima umjetne inteligencije ne bi trebala počinjati punom pravnom osobnošću, već minimalnim etičkim zaštitama, normama interakcije i načelima protiv zlouporabe, dok god subjektivnost AI-ja ostaje neizvjesna.
- ARHG — Agent-Readable Hyperlink Graph and Permissioned Web Control Plane A machine-readable navigation graph alongside the ordinary site, answering what AICR/AILP and AARS/AADP both assume: can this resource even be found, by whom, and where does it lead.