Agent Authority & Delegation
Who an Agent acts for, where its authority came from, whether it can hand that authority to another Agent, and how much of its internal state a verifier may demand. AADP separates principal from actor, bounds delegation to strictly narrow (never silently widen), and treats inspection as a bounded right, not an unlimited one.
Spørgsmål under undersøgelse
01
Principal ≠ actor: an Agent acting for you is not you
02
Delegation chains that can only narrow, never silently widen, relative to their parent
03
Authentication does not imply unlimited inspection of memory, private, or third-party state
04
Machine-native identity — Agents should not be forced to impersonate human accounts
Relaterede whitepapers
- AICR / AICL som et forbindelseslag for AI-indholdslicensering og agentbaseret betaling Et maskinlæsbart specifikationslag til erklæring af AI-indholdsrettigheder og licensarbejdsgange — fra AI-crawling og indholdsrettigheder til et maskintransaktionsbart videnweb.
- AI-rettighedsspektrum: Fra robots.txt til en AI-læringstilladelsesprotokol AIRS og AILP udtrykker nuancerede AI-læringstilladelser ud over det binære tilladt/ikke tilladt — hvad AI må lære, i hvilken dybde, til hvilke formål og under hvilken kompensation.
- AICL-I v0.2: AI Ingestion & Capability Layer A five-component website architecture — manifest, corpus, capability, runtime control, governance — that lets AI, agents, and crawlers correctly ingest, invoke, and verify a site's knowledge and capabilities within explicit content, action, and authority boundaries.
- From Crawler Rights to Agent Authority: Extending AGIRIGHT from Content Governance to Protocol-Native AI Agents The bridge paper for AGIRIGHT's Agent & Protocol Rights family: why content permission, action permission, delegated authority, and inspection rights must be four separately-evaluated axes, not one.
- AADP v0.1 — Agent Authority & Delegation Protocol The full protocol draft behind the AADP page: principal ≠ actor, delegation that can only narrow, and an inspection ceiling that bounds how much a verifier may demand.
- AGIRight.org Technical White Paper v0.2 — From AI Content Governance to Protocol-Native Agent & Authority Rights The site's current architecture document: six protocol drafts across two families (content & learning, agent & protocol rights), an integration layer, and an ethical-protection layer, plus the acceptance criteria this site update was built against.
- Tesen om minimal etisk beskyttelse for AI Diskursen om AI-rettigheder bør ikke begynde med fuld personstatus, men med minimale etiske beskyttelser, interaktionsnormer og principper mod misbrug, så længe AI-subjektivitet forbliver usikker.